Minimax Aspects of Bounded-Influence Regression
有界影响回归的极小极大性质AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦一般回归的稳健估计与杠杆诊断,未明确涉及所列经济学细分领域。
有界影响回归的极小极大性质AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Bounded-influence regression (in the sense of Hampel-Mallows-Krasker-Welsch) is examined critically from the point of view of finite-sample minimax robust estimation theory. The main conclusion is that the influence of position of very high leverage points—that is, of points where the diagonal element of the hat matrix H = X(XTX)−1 XT exceeds a certain bound—should be cut down selectively. This bound should be chosen roughly between .2 and .5; for the upper of these values, the resulting estimate can be approximated very simply by scaling the residuals by their own estimated standard deviation. A conflict between decision theoretic (estimation) and data analytic (diagnostic) viewpoints is pointed out and briefly discussed.