The Precision of Unbiased Ratio-Type Estimators
无偏比率型估计量的精度AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究有限总体抽样中的比率估计与方差比较,未提供因果、面板或分布效应等细分证据。
无偏比率型估计量的精度AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
When each unit in a population of N units consists of an x and a y measurement, where the population mean [Xbar] of the x's is known, then the population mean [Ybar] of the y's is frequently estimated by drawing a random sample of n units and using one of the customary biased ratio-type estimators, [Ybar] (based on the ratio of the y sample mean and the x sample mean), or [Ybar] (based on the sample mean of the ratios of the y and x measurements for each unit). The precision of these estimators is compared with an exact formula derived here (when N>>n) for the variance of an unbiased ratio-type estimator yǐ, a modification of [Ybar] and [Ybar], introduced in [5]. Conditions pertaining to the population moments are obtained under which Var yǐ < Var [Ybar], and it is also shown that Var yǐ < Var [Ybar] (when nŕ ∞) if and only if the slope of the population regression line of y on x is closer to the population mean of the ratios of the y and x measurements for each unit than to [Ybar]/[Xbar]. The estimation of the variances of the three ratio-type estimators is discussed, and some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the comparison of the estimators. Certain special populations are examined in detail, and the relation between regression and ratio-type estimators is also discussed.