跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要提出通用层级广义线性模型,虽包含随机效应,但未明确面板或其他所列经济计量任务,故暂不分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Y. Lee
J. A. Nelder

层级广义线性模型

研究问题
如何在广义线性模型的线性预测子中加入不必正态分布的额外随机成分,并统一固定效应、随机效应与离散参数推断?
方法与思路
作者提出层级似然以避免边际似然所需积分,并用调整后的剖面层级似然估计离散成分,同时构造诊断与选择方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在适当条件下固定效应估计与边际似然渐近等价,并给出随机效应预测、广义限制最大似然及拟合诊断框架。
阅读关注点
核对层级似然的构造与调整、渐近等价和随机效应预测条件,以及总体平均模型与个体特定模型之间的联系。
阅读边界
材料为所给Crossref摘要;关键渐近条件和计算细节未列出,不能将避免积分理解为任意模型中都准确或高效。

原文摘要

SUMMARY We consider hierarchical generalized linear models which allow extra error components in the linear predictors of generalized linear models. The distribution of these components is not restricted to be normal; this allows a broader class of models, which includes generalized linear mixed models. We use a generalization of Henderson's joint likelihood, called a hierarchical or h-likelihood, for inferences from hierarchical generalized linear models. This avoids the integration that is necessary when marginal likelihood is used. Under appropriate conditions maximizing the h-likelihood gives fixed effect estimators that are asymptotically equivalent to those obtained from the use of marginal likelihood; at the same time we obtain the random effect estimates that are asymptotically best unbiased predictors. An adjusted profile h-likelihood is shown to give the required generalization of restricted maximum likelihood for the estimation of dispersion components. A scaled deviance test for the goodness of fit, a model selection criterion for choosing between various dispersion models and a graphical method for checking the distributional assumption of random effects are proposed. The ideas of quasi-likelihood and extended quasi-likelihood are generalized to the new class. We give examples of the Poisson–gamma, binomial–beta and gamma–inverse gamma hierarchical generalized linear models. A resolution is proposed for the apparent difference between population-averaged and subject-specific models. A unified framework is provided for viewing and extending many existing methods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文