Searching for Alternative Splicing With a Joint Model on Probe Measurability and Expression Intensities
联合建模探针可测性与表达强度以检测可变剪接AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以生物学剪接检测为目标,中位数回归是分析工具,未研究给定分类中的分位数或分布效应。
反馈分类问题联合建模探针可测性与表达强度以检测可变剪接AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The exon tiling array offers a high throughput technology to search for aberrant splicing in biomedical research, but few methods of analysis for splicing detection have been tested both statistically and empirically. Noisy measurements on nonresponsive probe selection regions and outlying intensities at some of the samples tend to distort model-based assessments. We propose a robust analysis of variance approach that incorporates an informative model on probe measurability and uses median regression rank scores for better reliability in alternative splicing detection. We study the validity and effectiveness of our proposed approach in contrast with some of the existing methods through an empirical investigation of a brain cancer experiment, where a set of biologically validated genes for splicing and nonsplicing are available. Our study demonstrates favorable performance of the proposed ranking method, but shows that analysis of statistical significance cannot be trusted from any conventional use of p-values. We warn of any routine attempt to interpret p-values and their derivatives in model-based detection of alternative splicing.