跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于病例对照抽样与测量误差方法,二元疾病回归本身不足以确定所列细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
R. J. Carroll
M. H. Gail
J. H. Lubin

协变量存在测量误差的病例对照研究

研究问题
在部分病例和对照仅有含误差协变量、部分拥有真实值及误差测量时,如何估计前瞻性逻辑回归的参数?
方法与思路
作者以经验分布替代未知分布构造伪似然,联合估计回归与误差参数,并考察条件均值替代和近似逻辑回归。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,各类程序均有渐近理论;在疾病罕见且误差非差异等条件下,还提供计算较简便的替代估计方法。
阅读关注点
应核对完整数据的抽样方式、误差模型的可识别性,以及验证样本或重复测量支持条件均值估计的具体条件。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;简化方法依赖额外条件,重复测量并非总能识别所需条件均值,适用范围需查全文。

原文摘要

We devise methods for estimating the parameters of a prospective logistic model with dichotomous response D and arbitrary covariates X from case-control data when these covariates are measured with error. We suppose that some fraction of the cases and controls provide only the error-prone covariate measurements, W (the “incomplete” or “reduced” data), whereas some of the cases and controls provide measurements on X and W (the “complete” data). We assume a measurement error density with a finite set of parameters α, namely fw|xD(w|x, d, α), and nondifferential error is treated as a special case of this model, fw|x(w|X, α). Our algorithm estimates both the logistic parameters and α from a pseudolikelihood. Because empirical distribution functions are used in place of needed distributions in the pseudolikelihoods, the required asymptotic theory is more elaborate than for pseudolikelihoods based on substitution for a finite number of nuisance parameters. We also examine computationally simpler methods under the assumptions that the disease is rare and that errors are nondifferential. Estimates of m(W) = E(X|W) are substituted for X in the logistic model when X is not available. Such estimates of m(W) can be obtained from the complete data described above or from an independent validation study. If measurements on X are not available, m(W) can still be estimated from replicated W measurements in some circumstances. A final approach uses approximate logistic regression techniques and is appropriate when a more accurate approximation is required than obtained by simply substituting m(W) for X. Asymptotic theory is presented for each of these procedures, and examples are used to illustrate the calculations.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文