跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究调查抽样总体均值的稳健估计,未明确涉及所列分布效应或其他计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jean-Philippe Gwet
Louis-Paul Rivest

比率估计量的抗异常值替代方法

研究问题
复杂抽样中利用辅助信息估计总体均值时,异常值如何影响比率估计的偏差与方差,抗异常值方法能否改善均方误差?
方法与思路
作者用过原点回归斜率的 M 或 GM 估计构造抗异常值比率估计量,分析抽样随机化下的偏差、方差及条件偏差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提出均方误差估计,并发现抗异常值估计的条件偏差更稳定;两个总体的模拟显示其均方误差可明显降低。
阅读关注点
应核对抽样设计、异常值定义及估计量调节方式,区分条件与无条件偏差,并检查降方差代价和区间覆盖率。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;改进来自所述两个模拟总体,具体设计与数值未给出,不能外推普遍优势或刊本变化。

原文摘要

Many techniques have been suggested to lower the impact of outliers on sample survey estimates. Outliers can be downweighted by winsorization; that is, by replacing extreme data points by a data-dependent or a predetermined value before calculating estimates. Another approach is to reduce the weight of outliers, from the inverse sampling fraction to 1, in the estimation of population characteristics. In this article the problem of estimating the population mean using auxiliary information in the presence of outliers is considered. A resistant version of the ratio estimator is introduced. It is constructed with a M or a GM estimator of the slope of the regression model through the origin, which is implicitly called on when considering the ratio estimator. The asymptotic biases and asymptotic variances of the proposed alternatives to the ratio estimator are calculated with respect to the randomization of the sampling plan. The selection of a resistant estimator is seen to involve a trade-off between bias and variance. Often, some bias is the price paid to reduce the variance. A mean squared error estimator is proposed. A model-based estimator proposed by Chambers, reducing the weights given to extreme observations to 1, is also studied. A conditional investigation of the bias, given the proportion of outliers in the sample, is carried out. It reveals that the unconditional unbiasedness of the ratio estimator is, in the presence of outliers, deceptive. Its conditional bias varies substantially with the difference between the sample proportion and the population proportion of outliers. It can be severe if the proportion of outliers in the sample is much larger than in the population. The conditional bias of resistant estimators is, on the other hand, more stable. It does not depend as much on the proportion of outliers in the sample. Monte Carlo comparisons of the ratio estimator with resistant alternatives are presented for two populations. These similations show that in the presence of outliers, the mean squared error of resistant estimators can be substantially smaller than that of the ratio estimator. They also show that resistant confidence intervals are interesting alternatives to intervals based on the ratio estimator.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文