跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究前门识别、平均处理效应及因果效应估计与检验,直接属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Anna Guo
David Benkeser
Razieh Nabi

前门模型下因果效应的灵活非参数推断

研究问题
存在处理与结果的未观测混杂时,如何在前门假设下灵活估计平均处理效应和已处理者平均处理效应,并评估模型约束?
方法与思路
作者提出一步估计与目标最小损失估计,采用多种观测分布参数化,兼容机器学习辅助估计,并通过二阶余项分析渐近性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,部分方案无需建模中介密度;给出根号样本量一致性条件,并构造含双重稳健程序的约束检验及利用约束提升效率。
阅读关注点
应核对前门识别条件、辅助估计收敛要求、余项界,以及 Verma 约束检验能评估哪些限制、哪些因果假设仍不可检验。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 所给在线优先版本摘要。具体条件、模拟数值与应用结果未提供;摘要声称的良好表现不能据此推广,也不推断后续刊本变化。

原文摘要

Abstract Evaluating causal treatment effects in observational studies requires addressing confounding. While the back-door criterion enables identification through adjustment for observed covariates, it fails in the presence of unmeasured confounding. The front-door criterion offers an alternative by leveraging variables that fully mediate the treatment effect and are unaffected by unmeasured confounders of the treatment-outcome pair. We develop novel one-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under front-door assumptions. Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid modeling the mediator density entirely, and are compatible with flexible, machine learning-based nuisance estimation. We establish conditions for root-n consistency and asymptotic linearity by deriving second-order remainder bounds. We also develop flexible tests for assessing identification assumptions, including a doubly robust testing procedure, within a semiparametric extension of the front-door model that encodes generalized (Verma) independence constraints. We further show how these constraints can be leveraged to improve the efficiency of causal effect estimators. Simulation studies confirm favorable finite-sample performance, and real-data applications in education and emergency medicine illustrate the practical utility of our methods.

笔记与分组