Rational Bubbles at the Spectral Edge: An Operator-Spectral Theory of Fragility, Identification and Finite-Sample Certification
谱边界上的理性泡沫:脆弱性、识别与有限样本认证AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要把理性泡沫的价格与股利关系、市场主导因子和危机脆弱性连接起来,直接涉及资产定价、金融因子及系统性风险。
谱边界上的理性泡沫:脆弱性、识别与有限样本认证AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
When markets move more and more in lockstep, are they drifting towards the point where a price bubble becomes possible, and can that drift be measured before the crossing? This paper joins two long-separate ideas, that a rational bubble is a price outgrowing its dividends and that a crisis threshold can be read off the strength of a market's single dominant factor, onto one object recovered from the data: a summary of how asset returns move together, paired with a discount rate. We call this crossing point the fragility edge and show it plays three roles at once. A stated discipline says what the data support: the edge firmly, with a margin of error; whether a bubble exists, only roughly; which asset carries it, not at all. Across eighteen global equity indices from 2004 to 2024, that dominant factor strengthens in every documented crisis, the market collapsing from about six to about four independent factors; once the discount is set so that calm markets sit at the edge, this strength crosses it in crisis. These readings coincide with crises, not forecasts.