Measuring the Value of Housing Quality
住房质量价值的测量AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究住房属性的隐含价格,未明确结构估计或因果识别;使用因子分析也不足以归入宏观或金融因子模型。
住房质量价值的测量AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Based on an extensive sample of individual dwelling units, this article estimates the market value, or the implicit prices, of specific aspects of the bundles of residential services consumed by urban households. Quantitative estimates were obtained by regressing market price of owner- and renter-occupied dwelling units on measures of the qualitative and quantitative dimensions of the housing bundle. The measures of residential quality associated with individual dwelling units were obtained by using factor analysis to aggregate some 39 indexes of the quality of narrowly defined aspects of the dwelling units, structures, parcels, and micro-neighborhoods. The analysis indicates that the quality of the bundle of residential services has about as much effect on the price of housing as such objective aspects as the number of rooms, number of bathrooms, and lot size. The analysis also confirms the influence of neighborhood schools on the value of residential properties and indicates that rental properties in the ghetto may be systematically more expensive than those located outside of the ghetto.