跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦复杂抽样设计下的一般回归检验,未直接对应所列领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Barry I. Graubard
Edward L. Korn

复杂调查数据的假设检验:经典二次型统计量及回归应用

研究问题
在分层、多阶段整群和不等概率抽样下,如何检验均值或回归参数,尤其应对初级抽样群数较少、参数维度较大的情形?
方法与思路
作者把简单随机抽样下的经典二次型视为总体参数,采用设计基础估计与重复抽样近似其分布,并提出修改的Fay程序。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称模拟中修改程序比原Fay及Rao–Scott程序更好地维持名义检验水平,并用于比较设计基础回归系数与OLS系数。
阅读关注点
应核对有限总体渐近框架、重复方差估计与分布近似的构造,特别检查少群数、高维情形下的尺寸和功效比较。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要;原假设符号显示不清,需查原PDF。模拟设置、修正公式和改善幅度均未提供。

原文摘要

Sample surveys often have complex sample designs with multistage cluster sampling, stratification, and differential selection probabilities. This article is concerned with testing the null hypothesis H 0: θ = θ, where the p-dimensional parameter θ = g( μ ) and μ is a q-dimensional vector of means. The asymptotic framework that consists of a sequence of increasing finite populations is used to define μ as the limit of finite population means. As part of the inference, we use replicated estimates of variances that take into account the complex sample design. The Wald statistic can be used to test H 0. But inference for θ based on the Wald statistic can have low power. Thus an alternative to using a Wald test is pursued in this article. First, define a classical quadratic test statistic that would be used if one had a simple random sample of the population. Second, treating this quadratic form as a population parameter, use design-based methods to estimate it from the observed survey data. Last, use a replication method to approximate the distribution of this estimated quadratic form to perform the hypothesis test. Specific applications of this general approach have been used previously in contingency table analysis. For small numbers of sampled first-stage clusters and large p, modified versions of the Fay procedure are proposed. Simulations show that these modified procedures maintain nominal levels better than the original Fay and the Rao-Scott procedures for testing a vector of means and a vector of regression coefficients. An application is given for testing whether design-based regression coefficients differ from ordinary least squares regression coefficients.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文