跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论未观测变量同时影响暴露与结局造成的混杂,以及线性暴露效应在该混杂下的估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Brian Gilbert
Elizabeth L Ogburn
Abhirup Datta

空间混杂下常用空间估计量的一致性

研究问题
未观测空间变量同时影响暴露与结局时,常用空间回归估计量能否一致估计线性暴露效应,暴露的非空间变动起何作用?
方法与思路
作者比较普通最小二乘与受限空间回归的偏误,研究采用 Matérn 或平方指数工作协方差的广义最小二乘内填渐近一致性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称证明特定条件下广义最小二乘的一致性,并将固定函数混杂下部分空间估计量的一致性结论扩展至随机函数混杂。
阅读关注点
应核对内填渐近的采样设计、非空间暴露变动的要求、混杂函数的连续性,以及工作协方差和误差条件的作用。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断完整识别及正则条件;所称一致性不能推广到任意空间混杂或有限样本无偏,刊本变化未提供。

原文摘要

Summary This article addresses the asymptotic performance of popular spatial regression estimators of the linear effect of an exposure on an outcome under spatial confounding, the presence of an unmeasured spatially structured variable influencing both the exposure and the outcome. We first show that the estimators from ordinary least squares and restricted spatial regression are asymptotically biased under spatial confounding. We then prove a novel result on the infill consistency of the generalized least squares estimator using a working covariance matrix from a Matérn or squared exponential kernel, in the presence of spatial confounding. The result holds under very mild assumptions, accommodating any exposure with some nonspatial variation, any spatially continuous fixed confounder function, and non-Gaussian errors in both the exposure and the outcome. Finally, we prove that spatial estimators from generalized least squares, Gaussian process regression and spline models that are consistent under confounding by a fixed function will also be consistent under endogeneity or confounding by a random function, i.e., a stochastic process. We conclude that, contrary to some claims in the literature on spatial confounding, traditional spatial estimators are capable of estimating linear exposure effects under spatial confounding as long as there is some noise in the exposure. We support our theoretical arguments with simulation studies.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文