Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives theoretical and computational results
多元正态矩形概率及其导数的模拟:理论与计算结果AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将多项 Probit 的选择概率及其导数计算作为核心计量应用。
多元正态矩形概率及其导数的模拟:理论与计算结果AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
An extensive literature in econometrics and in numerical analysis has considered the problem of evaluating the multiple integral P(B; μ, Ω) = ∝ab n(v − μ, Ω)dv ≡ Ev1(V ϵ B), where V is a m-dimensional normal vector with mean μ, covariance matrix Ω, and density n(v − μ, Ω), and 1(V ϵ B) is an indicator for the event B = (V¦a < V < b). A leading case of such an integral is the negative orthant probability, where B = (V ¦V < 0). The problem is computationally difficult except in very special cases. The multinomial probit (MNP) model used in econometrics and biometrics has cell probabilities that are negative orthant probabilities, with μ and Ω depending on unknown parameters (and, in general, on covariates). Estimation of this model requires, for each trial parameter vector and each observation in a sample, evaluation of P(B; μ, Ω) and of its derivatives with respect to μ and Ω. This paper surveys Monte Carlo techniques that have been developed for approximations of P(B; μ, Ω) and its linear and logarithmic derivatives, that limit computation while possessing properties that facilitate their use in iterative calculations for statistical inference: the Crude Frequency Simulator (CFS), Normal Importance Sampling (NIS), a Kernel-Smoothed Frequency Simulator (KFS), Stern's Decomposition Simulator (SDS), the Geweke-Hajivassiliou-Keane Simulator (GHK), a Parabolic Cylinder Function Simulator (PCF), Deák's Chi-squared Simulator (DCS), an Acceptance/Rejection Simulator (ARS), the Gibbs Sampler Simulator (GSS), a Sequentially Unbiased Simulator (SUS), and an Approximately Unbiased Simulator (AUS). We also discuss Gauss and FORTRAN implementations of these algorithms and present our computational experience with them. We find that GHK is overall the most reliable method.