跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究隐私化成对排序的聚合理论,未明确采用离散选择结构或识别经济选择参数,分类证据不足。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shirong Xu
Will Wei Sun
Guang Cheng

基于隐私化成对排序的速率最优排序聚合

研究问题
成对偏好经随机响应机制隐私化后不再符合原比较模型时,如何校正排序聚合偏差,并量化隐私保护对偏好估计及部分、完整排序恢复的影响?
方法与思路
作者针对随机响应后的成对排序提出自适应去偏方法,在一般比较模型下估计真实偏好,并分析隐私保证、估计误差与排序误差之间的关系。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法能一致估计真实偏好,文章建立估计误差的极小极大速率及部分、完整排序恢复的误差收敛率,并通过模拟和应用验证。
阅读关注点
应核对一般比较模型的范围、隐私机制和隐私保证的定义,以及去偏与一致性所需条件,并区分偏好参数、前 K 项集合和完整排序的误差。
阅读边界
依据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。摘要未说明具体模型、隐私参数和速率条件,不能据此给出普适最优的隐私设置。

原文摘要

In various real-world scenarios, such as recommender systems and political surveys, pairwise rankings are commonly collected and used for rank aggregation to derive an overall ranking of items. However, preference rankings can reveal individuals’ personal preferences, highlighting the need to protect them from exposure in downstream analysis. In this article, we address the challenge of preserving privacy while ensuring the utility of rank aggregation based on pairwise rankings generated from a general comparison model. A common privacy protection strategy in practice is the use of the randomized response mechanism to perturb raw pairwise rankings. However, a critical challenge arises because the privatized rankings no longer adhere to the original model, resulting in significant bias in downstream rank aggregation tasks. To address this, we propose an adaptive debiasing method for rankings from the randomized response mechanism, ensuring consistent estimation of true preferences and enhancing the utility of downstream rank aggregation. Theoretically, we provide insights into the relationship between overall privacy guarantees and estimation errors in private ranking data, and establish minimax rates for estimation errors. This enables the determination of optimal privacy guarantees that balance consistency in rank aggregation with privacy protection. We also investigate convergence rates of expected ranking errors for partial and full ranking recovery, quantifying how privacy protection affects the specification of top-K item sets and complete rankings. Our findings are validated through extensive simulations and a real-world application. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文