(Machine) learning parameter regions
用机器学习刻画参数区域AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以结构VAR的脉冲响应识别集和联合推断说明参数区域学习的用途。
用机器学习刻画参数区域AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
How many random points from an identified set, a confidence set, or a highest posterior density set suffice to describe them? This paper argues that taking random draws from a parameter region in order to approximate its shape is a supervised learning problem (analogous to sampling pixels of an image to recognize it). Misclassification error – a common criterion in machine learning – provides an off-the-shelf tool to assess the quality of a given approximation. We say a parameter region can be learned if there is an algorithm that yields a misclassification error of at most ϵ with probability at least 1−δ, regardless of the sampling distribution. We show that learning a parameter region is possible if and only if its potential shapes are not too complex. Moreover, the tightest band that contains ad-dimensional parameter region is always learnable from the inside (in a sense we make precise), with at least max(1−ϵ)ln1∕δ,(3∕16)d∕ϵ draws, but at most min{2dln(2d∕δ),exp(1)(2d+ln(1∕δ))}∕ϵ. These bounds grow linearly in the dimension of the parameter region, and are uniform with respect to its true shape. We illustrate the usefulness of our results using structural vector autoregressions. We show how many orthogonal matrices are necessary/sufficient to evaluate the impulse responses’ identified set and how many ‘shotgun plots’ to report when conducting joint inference on impulse responses.