跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要针对遗传性状相关与连锁不平衡开展高维估计,未提供所列微观、宏观或金融方向的直接研究背景。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqiao Wang
Hongzhe Li

利用汇总关联统计量估计遗传相关性

研究问题
原始基因型数据不可得时,如何用汇总关联统计量估计两个性状的遗传相关性,并区分多效性与连锁不平衡带来的相关来源?
方法与思路
作者在高维线性模型下构造矩估计量,结合回归系数和连锁不平衡矩阵定义并分解遗传相关性,分析一致性与渐近正态性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法可由汇总统计量计算,并揭示连锁不平衡得分回归对信息利用与方差估计的局限;模拟和实证支持其稳健性与解释性。
阅读关注点
应核对相关性定义、连锁不平衡信息的获取、汇总统计量所需条件,以及一致性、方差估计和不同遗传结构比较的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法确定完整模型条件或稳健性边界;遗传学中的因果位点表述不能直接视为经济学因果识别。

原文摘要

Summary Genome-wide association studies have identified thousands of genetic variants that are associated with complex traits. Many complex traits are shown to share genetic etiology. Although various genetic correlation measures and their estimators have been developed, rigorous statistical analysis of their properties, including their robustness to model assumptions, is still lacking. We develop a method of moments estimator of genetic correlation between two traits in the framework of high-dimensional linear models. We show that the genetic correlation defined based on the regression coefficients and the linkage disequilibrium matrix can be decomposed into both the pleiotropic effects and correlations due to linkage disequilibrium between the causal loci of the two traits. The proposed estimator can be computed from summary association statistics when the raw genotype data are not available. Theoretical properties of the estimator in terms of consistency and asymptotic normality are provided. The proposed estimator is closely related to the estimator from the linkage disequilibrium score regression. However, our analysis reveals that the linkage disequilibrium score regression method does not make full use of the linkage disequilibrium information, and its jackknife variance estimate can be biased when the model assumptions are violated. Simulations and real data analysis results show that the proposed estimator is more robust and has better interpretability than the linkage disequilibrium score regression method under different genetic architectures.

笔记与分组