跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以宏观预测为应用,研究样本外预测能力检验,并利用当前信息比较和选择未来预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Halbert White

条件预测能力检验

研究问题
在预测模型可能因动态、异质性或函数形式而误设时,如何检验样本外预测能力,并依据当前信息选择未来更准确的预测?
方法与思路
作者在渐近框架中保留预测所依赖估计量的有限样本性质,构造条件样本外预测检验,并提出利用当前信息的两步选择规则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架统一条件与无条件预测评价,纳入估计不确定性,并可比较嵌套与非嵌套模型、采用一般估计方法。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对损失函数、条件信息集、估计窗口与渐近设定,尤其如何保留估计不确定性、处理嵌套模型及实施两步选择。
阅读边界
摘要未说明检验成立的具体正则条件、窗口设定或应用结果;所列优势属于作者陈述,不能据此判断所有预测情境下的表现。

原文摘要

We propose a framework for out-of-sample predictive ability testing and forecast selection designed for use in the realistic situation in which the forecasting model is possibly misspecified, due to unmodeled dynamics, unmodeled heterogeneity, incorrect functional form, or any combination of these. Relative to the existing literature (Diebold and Mariano (1995) and West (1996)), we introduce two main innovations: (i) We derive our tests in an environment where the finite sample properties of the estimators on which the forecasts may depend are preserved asymptotically. (ii) We accommodate conditional evaluation objectives (can we predict which forecast will be more accurate at a future date?), which nest unconditional objectives (which forecast was more accurate on average?), that have been the sole focus of previous literature. As a result of (i), our tests have several advantages: they capture the effect of estimation uncertainty on relative forecast performance, they can handle forecasts based on both nested and nonnested models, they allow the forecasts to be produced by general estimation methods, and they are easy to compute. Although both unconditional and conditional approaches are informative, conditioning can help fine-tune the forecast selection to current economic conditions. To this end, we propose a two-step decision rule that uses current information to select the best forecast for the future date of interest. We illustrate the usefulness of our approach by comparing forecasts from leading parameter-reduction methods for macroeconomic forecasting using a large number of predictors.

笔记与分组