跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究倾向得分加权的分位数处理效应及其协变量选择。

反馈分类问题

Quantile Outcome Adaptive Lasso: Covariate Selection for Inverse Probability Weighting Estimator of Quantile Treatment Effects

分位数结果自适应 Lasso:分位数处理效应逆概率加权估计的协变量选择

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Takehiro Shoji
Jun Tsuchida
Hiroshi Yadohisa

分位数结果自适应 Lasso:分位数处理效应逆概率加权估计的协变量选择

研究问题
使用倾向得分加权估计分位数处理效应时,如何选择与结果均值或目标分位数相关的协变量,以改善效应估计表现?
方法与思路
作者以分位数回归作为结果模型,将其偏回归系数用于构造正则化权重,进行倾向得分模型的数据驱动协变量选择。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法针对分位数处理效应选择相关协变量,并在模拟及母婴数据中显示,当协变量关联结果均值和分位数时表现良好。
阅读关注点
应核对正则化权重和调参规则、不同分位数是否分别选变量,以及选择后加权估计的重叠性、偏差和推断有效性。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,不能据此确认同行评审或接收。摘要未给出识别与选择一致性条件,不能将其变量纳入的偏差陈述普遍化。

原文摘要

When using the propensity score method to estimate the treatment effects, it is important to select the covariates to be included in the propensity score model. The inclusion of covariates unrelated to the outcome in the propensity score model led to bias and large variance in the estimator of treatment effects. Many data-driven covariate selection methods have been proposed for selecting covariates related to outcomes. However, most of them assume an average treatment effect estimation and may not be designed to estimate quantile treatment effects (QTE), which is the effect of treatment on the quantiles of outcome distribution. In QTE estimation, we consider two relation types with the outcome as the expected value and quantile point. To achieve this, we propose a data-driven covariate selection method for propensity score models that allows for the selection of covariates related to the expected value and quantile of the outcome for QTE estimation. Assuming the quantile regression model as an outcome regression model, covariate selection was performed using a regularization method with the partial regression coefficients of the quantile regression model as weights. The proposed method was applied to artificial data and a dataset of mothers and children born in King County, Washington, to compare the performance of existing methods and QTE estimators. As a result, the proposed method performs well in the presence of covariates related to both the expected value and quantile of the outcome.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文