跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用多重检验与神经同步,未提供经济网络、金融风险等细分方向的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
James G. Scott
Ryan C. Kelly
Matthew A. Smith
Pengcheng Zhou
Robert E. Kass

错误发现率回归及初级视觉皮层神经同步检测应用

研究问题
大规模多重检验中,各项检验具有辅助协变量时,如何利用这些信息识别信号,并应对统一分析在不同子集内的校准问题?
方法与思路
作者在两组混合模型中允许协变量影响局部错误发现率或信号后验概率,研究多种推断与计算方案,并应用于神经同步检测。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称模拟中存在协变量效应时功效改善,无效应时未见错误率膨胀;神经数据应用较标准分析检出更多同步配对。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对协变量进入混合模型的方式、局部与整体错误发现率的关系,以及误差校准、比较基准和神经同步的判定标准。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;模拟稳健性不能替代一般误差控制定理,更多同步检出也不等于真实性已验证,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Many approaches for multiple testing begin with the assumption that all tests in a given study should be combined into a global false-discovery-rate analysis. But this may be inappropriate for many of today's large-scale screening problems, where auxiliary information about each test is often available, and where a combined analysis can lead to poorly calibrated error rates within different subsets of the experiment. To address this issue, we introduce an approach called false-discovery-rate regression that directly uses this auxiliary information to inform the outcome of each test. The method can be motivated by a two-groups model in which covariates are allowed to influence the local false discovery rate, or equivalently, the posterior probability that a given observation is a signal. This poses many subtle issues at the interface between inference and computation, and we investigate several variations of the overall approach. Simulation evidence suggests that: (1) when covariate effects are present, FDR regression improves power for a fixed false-discovery rate; and (2) when covariate effects are absent, the method is robust, in the sense that it does not lead to inflated error rates. We apply the method to neural recordings from primary visual cortex. The goal is to detect pairs of neurons that exhibit fine-time-scale interactions, in the sense that they fire together more often than expected due to chance. Our method detects roughly 50% more synchronous pairs versus a standard FDR-controlling analysis. The companion R package FDRreg implements all methods described in the paper.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文