Estimation and Testing in a Two-Sample Generalized Odds-Rate Model
两样本广义优势率模型的估计与检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论两样本生存模型的半参数推断,未明确因果、离散选择或其他所列领域的研究问题。
两样本广义优势率模型的估计与检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The generalized odds ratio for a survival variable T is defined as Λ T (t | c) = c -1[1 - Sc (t)]/Sc (t) for c > 0 and -log S(t) for c = 0, where S(t) = Pr(T > t). This ratio coincides with the integrated hazard for c = 0 and the odds ratio for c = 1. When the distribution of T depends on a covariate vector, we assume that conditionally on the covariates, log Λ T (t | c) is linear in the covariates. This model is a generalization of the proportional hazard model (PHM), which has an interpretation both as a PHM with random nuisance effects (Clayton and Cuzick 1986) and as a proportional odds-rate model with the odds rate defined from the response times of series systems. Harrington and Fleming (1982) and Bickel (1986a) considered rank tests for this semiparametric model, Clayton and Cuzick (1986) considered estimation. We use the odds-rate representation to define a class of estimates of the proportionality parameter in the two-sample case. We show that the estimates are consistent and asymptotically normal, and that they lose little efficiency when compared with the optimal parametric estimates. Moreover, when testing for equality of distributions, the test statistics based on the semiparametric estimates are fully efficient when compared with best parametric tests.