Causal inference via implied interventions
通过隐含干预进行因果推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论工具变量下随机干预、因果效应识别和目标效应投影。
通过隐含干预进行因果推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In the context of having an instrumental variable, the standard practice in causal inference begins by targeting an effect of interest and proceeds by formulating assumptions enabling its identification. We turn this around by adhering to the interventions the observational distribution allows to identify, rather than starting with a desired causal estimand and imposing untestable conditions. The randomization of an instrument and its exclusion restriction define a class of auxiliary stochastic interventions on the treatment that are implied by stochastic interventions on the instrument. This mapping characterizes the identifiable causal effects of the treatment on the outcome given the observable distribution. The identified effect is the impact of a stochastic encouragement by the instrument that propagates through the unaltered treatment selection mechanism, rather than the effect of a hypothetical intervention that overrides how treatment is naturally chosen. Alternatively, searching for an intervention on the instrument whose implied one best approximates a desired target naturally leads to a projection representing the closest identifiable treatment effect. The generality of this projection allows to select different norms and indexing functional sets that give rise to diverse estimation problems, some of which we address using Expectation-Maximization and the Highly Adaptive Lasso.
IV-LASSO 的工具变量字典与惩罚选择
Estimating the first stage of an instrumental variables (IV) model with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) requires choosing a dictionary of technical instruments and a penalty level. First-order asymptotic theory offers no guidance on these choices, as any consistent implementation yields a structural parameter estimator with the same limiting distribution. In finite samples, however, these choices can have a substantial impact on the resulting…
基于大语言模型文本测量的再犯预测、同伴效应估计与预测辅助推断
We provide a new framework for estimating peer effects when outcomes are multivariate behavioral measures derived from written text using an LLM and the network formation is endogenous. We obtain LLM embeddings and zero shot classification of more than 200,000 written exchanges among residents of low-security correctional facilities. We find that LLM embeddings improve out-of-sample recidivism prediction by up to 30% over pre-entry covariates alone using LASSO and LoRA…
连接局部与总体因果效应:近端工具变量方法
Instrumental variable (IV) methods address treatment endogeneity, but with non-compliance and heterogeneous treatment effects a binary instrument generally identifies the local average treatment effect (LATE) among compliers rather than the population average treatment effect (ATE). When treatment effects and compliance probabilities are heterogeneous and dependent through latent factors, the ATE need not be identified by IV variation alone. We develop a proximal…
审查员工具变量设计的局部稳健半参数方法
I propose a locally robust semiparametric framework for estimating causal effects using examiner IV designs when adjustment for many or continuous covariates makes saturation infeasible or produces sparse cells. The key ingredient of this approach is an orthogonal moment function that removes the first-order effect of estimation errors in the two treatment regressions defining the examiner IV. I derive the orthogonal moment function and show that it remains valid under…
工具变量估计的新方法:TEAM-IV
Instrumental-variable (IV) analyses can be undermined when some instruments violate the exclusion restriction through direct effects on the outcome. Existing robust IV methods, including sisVIVE and CIIV, rely on majority- or plurality-validity conditions. We propose TEAM-IV, which targets joint validity by identifying sets of instruments that appear valid together and aggregating them, allowing reliable estimation even when only a small number of candidate instruments are…
两样本孟德尔随机化的自适应惩罚与自助平滑推断
Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate causal effects from observational data using summary association statistics. However, horizontal pleiotropy can invalidate standard MR estimators and lead to biased causal inference. Pleiotropy-robust methods have been proposed to address this issue, including regularization-based approaches such as MR-Lasso. However, MR-Lasso may fail to identify invalid instruments…