跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究有序离散行动的静态博弈结构估计,并应用于连锁企业进入决策。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Amit Gandhi

有序行动博弈的估计:连锁店进入的应用

研究问题
当企业同时决定是否进入市场及开设多少门店时,如何在存在多重均衡的情况下识别战略互动的方向与相对强度?
方法与思路
作者在收益函数形状限制下,由均衡推导行动与战略指数之间的协方差限制,并利用矩不等式进行识别、估计和推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所推限制对多重均衡稳健;零售药店应用发现企业战略效应不对称,且较大市场中的业务争夺效应较弱。
阅读关注点
应核对收益形状限制、战略指数的参数含义、多重均衡稳健性的范围,以及进入的广延与集约边际如何共同进入估计。
阅读边界
仅据所给OpenAlex版本摘要,完整识别条件、估计数值与政策反事实未说明,不能据此直接作合并政策判断,刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

We study the estimation of static games where players are allowed to have ordered actions, such as the number of stores to enter into a market. Assuming that payoff functions satisfy general shape restrictions, we show that equilibrium of the game implies a covariance restriction between each player's action and a component of the player's payoff function that we call the strategic index. The strategic index captures the direction of strategic interaction (i.e., patterns of substitutability or complementarity) as well as the relative effects of opponents' decisions on players' payoffs. The covariance restriction we derive is robust to the presence of multiple equilibria, and provides a basis for identification and estimation of the strategic index. We introduce an econometric method for inference in our model that exploits the information in moment inequalities in a computationally simple way. We analyze its properties through Monte Carlo experiments and then apply our approach to study entry behavior by chain stores where there is both an intensive margin of entry (how many stores to open in a market) as well as the usual extensive margin of entry (whether to enter a market or not). Using data from retail pharmacies we find evidence of asymmetries in strategic effects among firms in the industry that has implications for merger policy. We also find that business stealing effects are less pronounced in larger markets, which helps explain the large positive correlation in entry behavior observed in the data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文