跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般混合模型的同质性检验,未限定离散选择、面板或分布效应应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jiaying Gu
Roger Koenker

混合模型中的同质性检验

研究问题
如何检验总体同质性相对于一般混合异质性的备择,并比较局部最优的 C(α) 检验与非参数混合似然比检验?
方法与思路
作者以 Kiefer–Wolfowitz 极大似然估计非参数混合分布,结合凸优化计算似然比,并采用自助法确定临界值。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立自助法一致性,改善混合分布估计的计算效率,并比较两类检验的适用情形及自助临界值的有限样本表现。
阅读关注点
核对同质性零假设、混合分布的允许范围与似然比极限,查看凸优化实现、自助方案及两类检验各自占优的情形。
阅读边界
所给 Crossref 摘要未说明混合核、正则条件与比较数值;局部最优性或自助临界值改善不能解释为所有备择下更优。

原文摘要

Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalized as mixtures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as C ( α ) tests, as in Neyman (1959), and shown to be locally asymptotically optimal. These C ( α ) tests will be contrasted with a new approach to likelihood ratio testing for general mixture models. The latter tests are based on estimation of general nonparametric mixing distribution with the Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1956) maximum likelihood estimator. Recent developments in convex optimization have dramatically improved upon earlier EM methods for computation of these estimators, and recent results on the large sample behavior of likelihood ratios involving such estimators yield a tractable form of asymptotic inference. Improvement in computation efficiency also facilitates the use of a bootstrap method to determine critical values that are shown to work better than the asymptotic critical values in finite samples. Consistency of the bootstrap procedure is also formally established. We compare performance of the two approaches identifying circumstances in which each is preferred.

笔记与分组