An Old Approach to Finite Population Sampling Theory
有限总体抽样理论的一种传统路径AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于有限总体抽样与一般推断理论,没有直接对应的领域细分。
有限总体抽样理论的一种传统路径AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The main objective of this work is to relate classical inference and sampling theory (and current sampling practice) to recent advances toward formalizing and unifying the theory of sampling from finite populations. It is pointed out that the use of definitions which coincide with what seem to be the traditional notions of simple random sampling, and post-stratification (stratification after sampling) leads to the solution of such riddles which appear in the more recent theory as the failure of the likelihood principle to sanction any non-trivial inference whatever. In particular, a general method of maximum likelihood is shown to lead to new estimates for the population mean when the three aforementioned sampling plans are employed. Thus objective likelihood inference from sample to population is seen in these instances to be possible if and only if randomization is employed in the selection of the sample. Finally, completeness theorems are proved which imply that in the simplest common sampling problems conventional unbiased estimators of population parameters have the happy property of being the unique unbiased estimators.