Design-based Estimation and Inference on Quantile Exposure Effect under General Interference
一般干扰下分位数暴露效应的设计型估计与推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究网络干扰下的因果暴露效应、分位数效应及直接与溢出效应。
一般干扰下分位数暴露效应的设计型估计与推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Many applications in public health, environmental science, and economics feature spillovers across connected units, violating the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA) underlying classical quantile treatment effect methods. We develop a general framework for defining, estimating, and conducting inference for quantile exposure effects (QEEs) under network interference, encompassing quantile direct and spillover effects as leading cases. Studying QEEs under interference faces three substantive challenges. First, because a single exposure level represents many neighborhood treatment configurations, the causal estimand must aggregate over these configurations in an interpretable manner. Second, quantile estimands are intrinsically non-smooth, placing them outside much of the existing network theory involving only Lipschitz or differentiable functionals. Third, in design-based, finite-population network settings, conventional smoothness assumptions on outcome densities cannot be imposed directly. Using conditional neighborhood dependence, we establish asymptotic normality under explicit network degree conditions and derive a locally uniform convergence rate for kernel density estimation. We also characterize the variance estimation bias arising from heterogeneous unit-specific score means and construct asymptotically conservative confidence intervals. Extensive simulations and an application to an educational intervention in school friendship networks demonstrate that the proposed framework reveals heterogeneous exposure effects, including tail-specific impacts, that are missed by analyses based solely on average treatment effects.