跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究逆概率加权的目标参数推断,并以 National Supported Work 就业干预项目数据作应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xinwei Ma
Jingshen Wang

基于逆概率加权的稳健推断

研究问题
逆概率加权遇到接近零的概率分母时,如何处理非高斯极限与截尾偏差,使不同截尾阈值下的目标参数推断有效?
方法与思路
作者区分概率接近零程度及截尾阈值对应的渐近分布,通过重抽样和截尾偏差修正推断,并按经验渐近均方误差选阈值。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称程序适应高斯和非高斯极限,对小概率与广泛阈值选择保持稳健,且允许数据驱动阈值;另以就业项目数据示例。
阅读关注点
应核对目标参数、概率尾部条件、偏差修正和重抽样构造,以及估计概率与数据驱动阈值对推断有效性的影响。
阅读边界
来源为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;未列出有效性条件,也未说明应用中的因果识别要求,不能理解为任意权重下均有效或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Inverse probability weighting (IPW) is widely used in empirical work in economics and other disciplines. As Gaussian approximations perform poorly in the presence of “small denominators,” trimming is routinely employed as a regularization strategy. However, ad hoc trimming of the observations renders usual inference procedures invalid for the target estimand, even in large samples. In this article, we first show that the IPW estimator can have different (Gaussian or non-Gaussian) asymptotic distributions, depending on how “close to zero” the probability weights are and on how large the trimming threshold is. As a remedy, we propose an inference procedure that is robust not only to small probability weights entering the IPW estimator but also to a wide range of trimming threshold choices, by adapting to these different asymptotic distributions. This robustness is achieved by employing resampling techniques and by correcting a non-negligible trimming bias. We also propose an easy-to-implement method for choosing the trimming threshold by minimizing an empirical analogue of the asymptotic mean squared error. In addition, we show that our inference procedure remains valid with the use of a data-driven trimming threshold. We illustrate our method by revisiting a dataset from the National Supported Work program. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组