跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦测量误差下回归参数界限,未建立因果识别或明确的结构行为模型。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Dan A. Black
Mark C. Berger
Frank A. Scott

非经典测量误差下参数估计的界限

研究问题
当测量误差与真实解释变量负相关时,如何界定回归参数,并利用同一变量的两份含噪报告收紧界限或实现点估计?
方法与思路
作者研究单变量回归中 OLS 与 IV 估计之间的渐近界限,再利用重复报告改进界限,并以矩方法处理部分点估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称将界限结果扩展至简单多变量模型,并在医保与工资增长、双胞胎教育与工资数据中展示收紧界限的用途。
阅读关注点
应核对负协方差之外的工具变量与报告误差条件、界限方向,以及连续和离散变量点识别分别需要哪些限制。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;负协方差不是完整识别条件,作者明确指出教育应用未纠正教育内生性。

原文摘要

The bias introduced by errors in the measurement of independent variables has increasingly been a topic of interest among researchers estimating economic parameters. However, studies typically use the assumption of classical measurement error; that is, the variable of interest and its measurement error are uncorrelated, and the expected value of the mismeasured variable is equal to the expected value of the true measure. These assumptions often arise from convenience rather than conviction. When a variable is bounded, it is likely that the measurement error and the true value of the variable are negatively correlated. We consider the case of a noisily measured variable with a negative covariance between the measurement error and the true value of the variable. We show that, asymptotically, the parameter in a univariate regression is bounded between the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator and an instrumental variables (IV) estimator. Further, we demonstrate that the OLS bound can be improved in the case where there are two noisy reports on the variable of interest. In the case of continuous variables, this lower-bound estimate is a consistent estimate of the parameter. In the case of binary or discrete noisily measured variables, we also identify point estimates using a method-of-moments framework. We then extend our bounding results to simple multivariate models with measurement error. We provide empirical applications of our analytical results using employer and employee reports on health insurance coverage and wage growth, and reports of identical twins on the level of schooling and wages. Using OLS, health insurance coverage is associated with a reduction in wage growth of 6.5–7.4%, whereas IV estimates suggest a 11.2–11.8% reduction associated with health insurance coverage. We are able to improve the lower bound estimate to 8.2% using our bounding strategy and obtain a point estimate of 8.8% using the method-of-moments framework. The estimates using the data for identical twins, though not correcting for problems such as endogenous determination of the level of schooling, do illustrate the potential usefulness of correcting for measurement error as a complement to other approaches. Using the multiple reports on the level of schooling and the our proposed estimators, we are able to tighten the spread between the upper- and lower-bound estimates of the returns to schooling from 7–10 percentage points to approximately 4 percentage points.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文