Robustness of Stein's Two-Stage Procedure for Mixtures of Normal Populations
正态总体混合下 Stein 两阶段程序的稳健性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要分析通用两阶段检验及置信区间对正态混合的稳健性,未呈现所列经济计量领域特有的数据或研究结构。
反馈分类问题正态总体混合下 Stein 两阶段程序的稳健性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Explicit expressions for the level of significance and power of Stein's two-stage hypothesis testing procedure are derived when the normal population is mixed with another normal population differing in the mean. Approximate expansions for these expressions have been obtained, and numerical studies of the size have been carried out using the expansions. Some numerical indication of the accuracy of the approximations has also been obtained. Stein's two-stage procedure is quite robust against mixtures of normal populations differing in location parameters. Similar conclusions can be drawn regarding the coverage probabilities of confidence intervals generated by this procedure.