On Bickel and Ritov's conjecture about adaptive estimation of the integral of the square of density derivative
关于密度导数平方积分自适应估计的 Bickel–Ritov 猜想AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用密度导数泛函的自适应估计理论,未涉及分位数、分布效应或其他所列方向。
关于密度导数平方积分自适应估计的 Bickel–Ritov 猜想AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Bickel and Ritov suggested an optimal estimator for the integral of the square of the kth derivative of a density when the unknown density belongs to a Lipschitz class of a given order $\beta$. In this context optimality means that the estimate is asymptotically efficient, that is, it has the best constant and rate of risk convergence, whenever $\beta > 2k + 1/4$, and it is rate optimal otherwise. The suggested optimal estimator crucially depends on the value of $\beta$ which is obviously unknown. Bickel and Ritov conjectured that the method of cross validation leads to a corresponding adaptive estimator which has the same optimal statistical properties as the optimal estimator based on prior knowledge of $\beta$. We show for probability densities supported over a finite interval that when $\beta > 2k + 1/4$ adaptation is not necessary for the construction of an asymptotically efficient estimator. On the other hand, it is not possible to construct an adaptive estimator which has the same rate of convergence as the optimal nonadaptive estimator as soon as $k < \beta \leq 2k + 1/4$.