跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用高维依赖度量与独立性检验,未提供对应所列经济应用细分领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Changbo Zhu
Xianyang Zhang
Shun Yao
Xiaofeng Shao

高维情形下基于距离与再生核希尔伯特空间的依赖度量

研究问题
高维随机向量之间的距离协方差与核依赖度量能否识别非线性依赖,以及联合检验何时会失去检验功效?
方法与思路
作者用分量样本交叉协方差的平方和近似联合依赖度量,并提出边际度量聚合检验,统一分析学生化统计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在所述分量弱依赖条件下,某些非线性但分量不相关的备择会使原检验极限功效平凡;聚合检验在模拟中改善功效。
阅读关注点
应核对维度与样本量的增长关系、分量弱依赖条件,以及边际聚合能够识别的备择类型和学生化所需条件。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要,不能将高维局限推广至所有核、依赖结构或渐近情形;具体条件及刊本变化未说明。

原文摘要

In this paper, we study distance covariance, Hilbert–Schmidt covariance (aka Hilbert–Schmidt independence criterion [In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2008) 585–592]) and related independence tests under the high dimensional scenario. We show that the sample distance/Hilbert–Schmidt covariance between two random vectors can be approximated by the sum of squared componentwise sample cross-covariances up to an asymptotically constant factor, which indicates that the standard distance/Hilbert–Schmidt covariance based test can only capture linear dependence in high dimension. Under the assumption that the components within each high dimensional vector are weakly dependent, the distance correlation based $t$ test developed by Székely and Rizzo (J. Multivariate Anal. 117 (2013) 193–213) for independence is shown to have trivial limiting power when the two random vectors are nonlinearly dependent but component-wisely uncorrelated. This new and surprising phenomenon, which seems to be discovered and carefully studied for the first time, is further confirmed in our simulation study. As a remedy, we propose tests based on an aggregation of marginal sample distance/Hilbert–Schmidt covariances and show their superior power behavior against their joint counterparts in simulations. We further extend the distance correlation based $t$ test to those based on Hilbert–Schmidt covariance and marginal distance/Hilbert–Schmidt covariance. A novel unified approach is developed to analyze the studentized sample distance/Hilbert–Schmidt covariance as well as the studentized sample marginal distance covariance under both null and alternative hypothesis. Our theoretical and simulation results shed light on the limitation of distance/Hilbert–Schmidt covariance when used jointly in the high dimensional setting and suggest the aggregation of marginal distance/Hilbert–Schmidt covariance as a useful alternative.

笔记与分组