跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕分位收入增长、累计收入份额变化及其估计推断展开,直接对应分位数与分布效应方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Sergio Firpo
Antonio F. Galvao

实际与反事实增长发生曲线及 Δ 洛伦兹曲线:估计与推断

研究问题
如何同时描述各收入分位的增长率与累计收入份额变化,并对这两类分位数函数进行估计和推断,以比较增长的分配特征?
方法与思路
作者提出不依赖均值水平的 Δ 洛伦兹曲线,刻画各分位以下累计收入份额的变化,并推导相关检验的零假设极限分布及重抽样推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新曲线及推断程序可补充增长发生曲线;1995—2007 年的比较显示,美国工资增长偏向高分位,巴西则偏向低分位。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对两类曲线的定义、极限分布与重抽样条件,以及工资样本的可比性;题名所指反事实构造也需查阅正文。
阅读边界
摘要未说明反事实分布如何构造、数据来源及抽样设计;两国工资分布差异是摘要报告的描述性结果,不能据此解释其成因。

原文摘要

Summary Different economic growth episodes display very different distributional characteristics, both across countries and over time. Growth is sometimes accompanied by rising and sometimes by falling inequality. Applied economists have come to rely on the growth incidence curve, which gives the quantile‐specific rate of income growth over a certain period, to describe these differences. This paper introduces a mean‐independent analogue, the delta Lorenz curve, which gives the cumulative change in income share up to each quantile. We also develop estimation and inference procedures for both functions of quantiles. We establish the limiting null distribution of the test statistics of interest for those functions, and propose resampling methods to implement inference in practice. The proposed methods are used to compare the growth processes in the USA and Brazil during 1995–2007. Although growth in the average real wages was disappointing in both countries, the distribution of that growth was markedly different. In the USA, wage growth was mediocre for the bottom 80% of the sample, but much more rapid for the top 20%. In Brazil, conversely, wage growth was rapid below the median, and negative at the top. Wage shares fell in the USA up to the 83rd percentile, and rose in Brazil up to the 65th percentile.

笔记与分组