跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用全局检验及遗传关联应用,未提供所列经济计量细分领域的充分文本依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yaowu Liu
Zilin Li
Xihong Lin

全局假设的极小极大最优岭型集合检验及全基因组测序应用

研究问题
面对一组变量的全局假设,如何减少经典检验在弱或中等信号下的功效损失,同时保持大规模数据分析的计算可行性?
方法与思路
作者提出极小极大最优岭型集合检验 MORST,并构造与传统 Wald 检验及 Rao 得分检验相对应的渐近推广形式。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法在弱或中等信号下具有较稳健的功效,模拟中第一类错误得到控制,基因组应用中检出区域数多于经典检验。
阅读关注点
应核对极小极大最优性对应的参数空间、岭型构造与调参规则,以及功效比较、错误控制和计算开销的具体依据。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;摘要未说明最优性条件,更多检出区域也不能直接等同于更多真实发现。

原文摘要

Testing a global hypothesis for a set of variables is a fundamental problem in statistics with a wide range of applications. A few well-known classical tests include the Hotelling’s T 2 test, the F-test, and the empirical Bayes based score test. These classical tests, however, are not robust to the signal strength and could have a substantial loss of power when signals are weak or moderate, a situation we commonly encounter in contemporary applications. In this article, we propose a minimax optimal ridge-type set test (MORST), a simple and generic method for testing a global hypothesis. The power of MORST is robust and considerably higher than that of the classical tests when the strength of signals is weak or moderate. In the meantime, MORST only requires a slight increase in computation compared to these existing tests, making it applicable to the analysis of massive genome-wide data. We also provide the generalizations of MORST that are parallel to the traditional Wald test and Rao’s score test in asymptotic settings. Extensive simulations demonstrated the robust power of MORST and that the Type I error of MORST was well controlled. We applied MORST to the analysis of the whole-genome sequencing data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, where MORST detected 20%–250% more signal regions than the classical tests. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文