跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以干预下的不变性开展因果关系识别,并构造因果关系的置信区间。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jonas Peters
Peter Bühlmann

利用不变预测进行因果推断:识别与置信区间

研究问题
能否利用因果模型在不同干预或环境中的预测不变性,筛选因果预测变量并构造置信区间,以及何时能够实现识别?
方法与思路
作者收集跨实验设置保持预测不变性的模型,以候选模型集合进行因果推断,并在结构方程模型中研究识别条件与误设稳健性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称真因果模型以高概率包含于候选集合,方法可提供有效因果置信区间;另给出识别充分条件,并研究稳健性及基因扰动应用。
阅读关注点
应核对不变性的正式定义、允许的干预类型、候选集合与置信区间的构造,以及识别条件和模型误设下保证的具体范围。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;干预覆盖、结构方程与误设条件未完整列出,不能把跨环境预测稳定直接视为因果关系的证明。

原文摘要

Summary What is the difference between a prediction that is made with a causal model and that with a non-causal model? Suppose that we intervene on the predictor variables or change the whole environment. The predictions from a causal model will in general work as well under interventions as for observational data. In contrast, predictions from a non-causal model can potentially be very wrong if we actively intervene on variables. Here, we propose to exploit this invariance of a prediction under a causal model for causal inference: given different experimental settings (e.g. various interventions) we collect all models that do show invariance in their predictive accuracy across settings and interventions. The causal model will be a member of this set of models with high probability. This approach yields valid confidence intervals for the causal relationships in quite general scenarios. We examine the example of structural equation models in more detail and provide sufficient assumptions under which the set of causal predictors becomes identifiable. We further investigate robustness properties of our approach under model misspecification and discuss possible extensions. The empirical properties are studied for various data sets, including large-scale gene perturbation experiments.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文