跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究空间疾病风险与贝叶斯层级建模,未明确因果识别或网络干扰,所列领域无直接对应。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
John C Wakefield
Sara E Morris

点源附近疾病风险的贝叶斯建模

研究问题
如何利用汇总病例与人口数据评估预设点源附近是否存在疾病风险升高,并处理额外泊松变异、空间相关及先验选择的影响?
方法与思路
作者采用贝叶斯疾病制图,以空间或非空间随机效应处理额外变异,参数化距离与风险关系,并借较大参考区域构建信息先验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出风险建模与预测分布汇总框架,研究先验和空间效应敏感性,用焚烧厂附近胃癌及后续四年资料示例,并讨论多地点层级扩展。
阅读关注点
应核对距离风险形式、参考区域先验构造及人口调整,检查空间效应与敏感性分析,并区分风险关联、预测结果和点源的因果效应。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;未提供风险升幅或后续持续性结果,汇总空间关联也不能直接证明点源导致疾病。

原文摘要

Recently there has been increased interest, from both the media and the public, in the question, “Is there an excess of disease risk close to a prespecified point source?” To address this question, routinely available public health data may be analyzed. In the United Kingdom, as in many countries, health data and the associated population data that are required for comparison, are available as aggregated counts. In this article we propose to analyze such data using a Bayesian disease mapping framework. This framework allows the extra-Poisson variability that is frequently encountered to be accommodated through random effects that may be unstructured or display spatial dependence. The disease risk-spatial location relationship is modeled using a simple but realistic parametric form. The random effects may be used for diagnostic purposes, in particular to assess the appropriateness of the distance-risk model. The choice of prior distribution is extremely important in this context and we develop an informative prior distribution that is based on epidemiological considerations and on additional analyses of data that are obtained from a larger “reference” region within which the study region is embedded. We argue that a particularly useful inferential summary for public health purposes is the predictive distribution. For example, we may obtain the distribution of the number of cases that would be expected to occur within a specified distance of the putative source (given a population size, by age and sex, and a time period). The approach is illustrated using data from an investigation into the incidence of stomach cancer close to a municipal solid waste incinerator. The sensitivity to the prior distribution and the presence or absence of spatial random effects is examined. To determine whether the increase in risk detected in the study is persistent, we analyze incidence data from the four-year interval following the study period. We finally describe a number of extensions including the modeling of data from a number of sites using a four-stage hierarchical model. This model is statistically realistic and, more importantly, allows the epidemiological question to be answered with greater reliability.

笔记与分组