跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究生存分析中的抽样偏倚与删失检验,未明确涉及所列经济分布效应或其他细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jing Ning
Jing Qin
Yu Shen

有偏抽样下右删失数据的非参数检验

研究问题
在患病现况队列等有偏抽样中,长度偏倚可能破坏独立删失假设,如何有效检验两组或多组生存分布是否相同?
方法与思路
作者从完整似然构造校正长度偏倚的非参数检验,利用渐近独立同分布表示推导零假设性质,并开展模拟及两个实际数据示例。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该检验具有渐近效率优势;在一般左截断数据中,组间截断与右删失模式相同时,模拟显示其误差控制及功效表现较好。
阅读关注点
应核对完整似然如何处理抽样与删失、效率结论针对的备择,以及左截断推广对组间模式一致性的要求和模拟比较的覆盖范围。
阅读边界
仅依据 Crossref 摘要。具体效率条件、模拟数值及实例细节未提供;一般左截断下的表现陈述带有组间截断和删失模式相同的条件。

原文摘要

Summary Testing the equality of two survival distributions can be difficult in a prevalent cohort study when non-random sampling of subjects is involved. Owing to the biased sampling scheme, the independent censoring assumption is often violated. Although the issues about biased inference caused by length-biased sampling have been widely recognized in the statistical, epidemiological and economical literature, there is no satisfactory solution for efficient two-sample testing. We propose an asymptotic most efficient non-parametric test by properly adjusting for length-biased sampling. The test statistic is derived from a full likelihood function and can be generalized from the two-sample test to a k-sample test. The asymptotic properties of the test statistic under the null hypothesis are derived by using its asymptotic independent and identically distributed representation. We conduct extensive Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of the test statistics proposed and compare them with the conditional test and the standard log-rank test for various biased sampling schemes and right-censoring mechanisms. For length-biased data, empirical studies demonstrated that the test proposed is substantially more powerful than the existing methods. For general left-truncated data, the test proposed is robust, still maintains accurate control of the type I error rate and is also more powerful than the existing methods, if the truncation patterns and right censoring patterns are the same between the groups. We illustrate the methods by using two real data examples.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文