Better subset regression
改进的子集回归AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维回归与变量筛选,未提供收益预测、因子模型等细分方向的直接证据。
改进的子集回归AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper studies the relationship between model fitting and screening performance to find efficient screening methods for high-dimensional linear regression models. Under a sparsity assumption we show in a general asymptotic setting that a subset that includes the true submodel always yields a smaller residual sum of squares than those that do not. To seek such a subset, we consider the optimization problem associated with best subset regression. An em algorithm, known as orthogonalizing subset screening, and its accelerated version are proposed for searching for the best subset. Although the algorithms do not always find the best subset, their monotonicity makes the subset fit the data better than initial subsets, and thus the subset can have better screening performance asymptotically. Simulation results show that our methods are very competitive.