跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要关注部分观测与两样本经验似然,未提出因果效应识别或其他所列专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Song Xi Chen
Denis H. Y Leung
Jing Qin

替代终点研究中的信息回收

研究问题
当验证样本观测结果、协变量和替代终点,而非验证样本仅观测后两者时,如何利用额外样本改善结果模型的参数估计?
方法与思路
作者构造两样本经验似然,同时结合验证与非验证样本的估计方程,不要求知道给定协变量时结果与替代终点的联合分布。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法提高估计效率,无需估计协方差矩阵即可构造置信域,并可用自助法经验 Bartlett 校正改善覆盖率。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对两随机样本的可比性、估计方程构造、效率比较条件,以及经验似然置信域与校正程序的有效性。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;信息回收并不意味着替代终点具有因果有效性,具体正则条件和改善幅度未说明。

原文摘要

Recently, there has been a lot of interest in statistical methods for analyzing data with surrogate endpoints. In this article, we consider parameter estimation from a model that relates a variable Y to a set of covariates, X, in the presence of a surrogate, S. We assume that the data are made up of two random samples from the population, a validation set where (Y, X, S) are observed on every subject and a nonvalidation set where only (X, S) are measured. We show how information from the nonvalidation set can be incorporated to improve upon estimation of a parameter β using the validation data only. The method we suggest does not require knowledge on the joint distribution between (Y, S), given X. It is based on a two-sample empirical likelihood that simultaneously combines the estimating equations from the validation set and the nonvalidation set. The proposed nonparametric likelihood formulation brings a few attractive features to the inference in β. First, the maximum empirical likelihood estimate is more efficient than that using only the validation sample. Second, confidence regions can be readily constructed without the need to estimate the variance-covariance matrix. Finally, the coverage of the confidence regions can be further improved by an empirical Bartlett correction based on the bootstrap. We show that the method gives favorable results in simulation studies.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文