Testing for the presence of jump components in jump diffusion models
跳跃扩散模型中跳跃成分的存在性检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要采用采样间隔趋零的高频观测框架,并以扩散波动率估计为跳跃检验的关键环节。
跳跃扩散模型中跳跃成分的存在性检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this paper we propose a nonparametric test to determine whether an underlying jump diffusion process indeed contains jump component, or equivalently, is indeed a diffusion. Our test is based upon a robust threshold estimation of diffusive volatility and the kernel estimation of the conditional moment function of the squared instantaneous increments of the underlying process. We show that our test statistic has asymptotic standard normal distribution under the null hypothesis of no jumps, is consistent against fixed alternatives, and may detect local alternatives that shrink to diffusions at certain convergence rates, when sampling interval shrinks to zero and time span is either fixed or expands. We only assume that the jump diffusion process is recurrent, thus allowing for both stationary and nonstationary cases. In addition, we provide a regression bootstrap test and establish its validity. A Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to examine the finite sample performances of our test, and an empirical illustration is also provided.