Asymptotically minimax regret procedures in regression model selection and the magnitude of the dimension penalty
回归模型选择的渐近极小极大遗憾规则与维数惩罚AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用回归模型选择,预测目标未限定为宏观预测或金融收益预测。
回归模型选择的渐近极小极大遗憾规则与维数惩罚AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper addresses the topic of model selection in regression.We emphasize the case of two models, testing which model provides a better prediction based on $n$ observations. Within a family of selection rules, based on maximizing a penalized log-likelihood under a normal model, we search for asymptotically minimax rules over a class $\mathscr{G}$ of possible joint distributions of the explanatory and response variables. For the class $\mathscr{G}$ of multivariate normal joint distributions it is shown that asymptotically minimax selection rules are close to the AIC selection rule when the models’ dimension difference is large. It is further proved that under fairly mild assumptions on $\mathscr{G}$ any asymptotically minimax sequence of procedures satisfies the condition that the difference in their dimension penalties is bounded as the number of observations approaches infinity. The results are then extended to the case of more than two competing models.