Real-time monitoring for stock return predictability in nonstationary volatility environments
非平稳波动环境下股票收益可预测性的实时监测AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕股票收益预测回归的实时监测、时变波动率与非参数调整展开,直接涉及时间序列监测方法、收益预测和波动率建模,故选择这三个领域细分。
非平稳波动环境下股票收益可预测性的实时监测AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Stock return predictability, should it exist, is likely to be episodic in nature. In order to exploit such pockets of predictability it is essential that they are rapidly detected, in real-time, as the nascent predictive regime emerges. This will typically entail the repeated (sequential) application of one-shot end-of-sample predictability statistics, updated as new data become available. Consequently, in addition to dealing with the usual inference problems caused by unknown regressor persistence and predictive regression endogeneity, one must also account for the multiple testing issues inherent in such monitoring procedures. In addition, stock returns and/or the predictors commonly used typically exhibit time-varying volatility and it is known that ignoring such data features can result in the spurious detection of predictability. We propose real-time monitoring procedures which take account of these issues. Our preferred monitoring strategy uses a CUSUM-type procedure based on a specific moment condition related to the predictive power of the putative predictor. We implement nonparametric adjustment methods to allow for the possibility of time varying volatility which do not require the practitioner to assume any particular parametric model for volatility. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that our proposed detection procedures display well controlled false positive rate across a range of feasible volatility paths coupled with good power to rapidly detect an emerging predictive episode. The empirical relevance of our proposed monitoring strategy is illustrated in a pseudo real-time monitoring exercise using a well-known dataset of S&P 500 returns.
Aggregate stock return volatility is both persistent and countercyclical. This paper tests whether it is possible to improve volatility forecasts at monthly and quarterly horizons by conditioning on additional macroeconomic variables. I find that several variables related to macroeconomic uncertainty, time-varying expected stock returns, and credit conditions Granger cause volatility. It is more difficult to find evidence that forecasts exploiting macroeconomic variables…
We analyze 18 quadrillion models for the joint pricing of corporate bond and stock returns. Strikingly, we find that equity and nontradable factors alone suffice to explain corporate bond risk premia once their Treasury term structure risk is accounted for, rendering the extensive bond factor literature largely redundant for this purpose. While only a handful of factors, behavioral and nontradable, are likely robust sources of priced risk, the true latent stochastic discount…
We tackle the issue of producing point, sign, and density forecasts for the monthly real price of carbon in the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). We show that Bayesian Vector Autoregressive (BVAR) models augmented with factors based on macroeconomic and financial variables yield improvements in point and density forecasting performance, with the largest point-forecast gains emerging at intermediate and longer horizons. In particular, the one-factor BVAR model…
The component of the volatility of total factor productivity (TFP) that is orthogonal to the dividend price ratio is shown to have long-run predictive ability for excess market returns. This finding implies that TFP volatility should also predict real cash flows and/or real interest rates: it is found to mainly predict real cash flows through inflation. A model with endogenous growth, Epstein-Zin preferences and price rigidities reconciles both TFP volatility-driven long-run…
We identify a yield news shock as an innovation that does not move Treasury yields contemporaneously but explains a maximum share of their future variation. Yields do not immediately respond to the news shock as the initial reaction of term premiums and expected short rates offset each other. While the impact on term premiums fades quickly, expected short rates and thus yields decline persistently. As a result, the shock explains a staggering 50% of Treasury yield variation…
We study the pricing of shocks to uncertainty and volatility using a wide-ranging set of options contracts covering a variety of different markets. If uncertainty shocks are viewed as bad by investors, they should carry negative risk premiums. Empirically, however, uncertainty risk premiums are positive in most markets. Instead, it is the realization of large shocks to fundamentals that has historically carried a negative premium. In other words, we find that the return…