Nonidentifiability in the presence of factorization for truncated data
截断数据中存在分解条件时的不可识别性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦生存数据截断机制与分布识别,未直接讨论分位数、分布效应或其他所列细分。
截断数据中存在分解条件时的不可识别性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary A time to event, $X$, is left-truncated by $T$ if $X$ can be observed only if $T<X$. This often results in oversampling of large values of $X$, and necessitates adjustment of estimation procedures to avoid bias. Simple risk-set adjustments can be made to standard risk-set-based estimators to accommodate left truncation when $T$ and $X$ are quasi-independent. We derive a weaker factorization condition for the conditional distribution of $T$ given $X$ in the observable region that permits risk-set adjustment for estimation of the distribution of $X$, but not of the distribution of $T$. Quasi-independence results when the analogous factorization condition for $X$ given $T$ holds also, in which case the distributions of $X$ and $T$ are easily estimated. While we can test for factorization, if the test does not reject, we cannot identify which factorization condition holds, or whether quasi-independence holds. Hence we require an unverifiable assumption in order to estimate the distribution of $X$ or $T$ based on truncated data. This contrasts with the common understanding that truncation is different from censoring in requiring no unverifiable assumptions for estimation. We illustrate these concepts through a simulation of left-truncated and right-censored data.