跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究单位根、非平稳性、分数及季节性差分与频域检验,直接对应时间序列。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
P. M. Robinson

非平稳假设的高效检验

研究问题
如何检验单位根及更一般的非平稳假设,同时允许整数、分数与季节性差分,并获得局部功效性质和便于使用的渐近临界值?
方法与思路
作者以得分原理构造频域统计量,对回归误差的假设差分进行检验,允许差分后为白噪声或具有弱的参数化自相关。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称检验对某类备择具有渐近局部最强功效和卡方临界值,并给出零假设及局部极限分布、经验应用与有限样本模拟。
阅读关注点
应核对局部备择类别、差分根与自相关的参数化、干扰参数估计,以及功效最优性条件和蒙特卡洛中的尺寸表现。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要;正则条件与比较数值未给出,局部渐近最优性不代表对全部备择或样本规模占优。

原文摘要

This article proposes tests for unit root and other forms of nonstationarity that are asymptotically locally most powerful against a certain class of alternatives and have asymptotic critical values given by the chi-squared distribution. Many existing unit root tests do not share these properties. The alternatives include fractionally and seasonally fractionally differenced processes. There is considerable flexibility in our choice of null hypothesis, which can entail one or more integer or fractional roots of arbitrary order anywhere on the unit circle in the complex plane. For example, we can test for a fractional degree of integration of order 1/2; this can be interpreted as a test for nonstationarity against stationarity. “Overdifferencing” stationary null hypotheses can also be tested. The test statistic is derived via the score principle and is conveniently expressed in the frequency domain. The series tested are regression errors, which, when the hypothesized differencing is correct, are white noise or more generally have weak parametric autocorrelation. We establish the null and local limit distributions of the statistic under mild regularity conditions. We find that Bloomfield's exponential spectral model can provide an especially neat form for the test statistic. We apply the tests to a number of empirical time series originally analyzed by Box and Jenkins, and in several cases find that our tests reject the order of differencing that Box and Jenkins proposed. We also report Monte Carlo studies of finite-sample behavior of versions of our tests and comparisons with other tests.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文