跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接检验静态和动态有序选择模型,并扩展至计数型离散响应。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Igor Kheifets
Carlos Velasco

条件离散响应模型的新拟合优度诊断

研究问题
如何检验静态和动态离散响应模型的设定,并避免传统随机扰动变换引入的额外随机性损害检验功效?
方法与思路
作者提出仅依赖原始离散数据的非随机化变换,研究相应拟合优度检验的渐近性质,并用自助法近似模型和参数相关的临界值。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新方法覆盖有序选择及无限支持的计数模型,解析与模拟比较显示其功效优于随机化方法,并应用于美联储货币政策模型。
阅读关注点
应核对新变换的定义、动态模型所需条件、自助法实施步骤及有效性,并查看解析功效比较覆盖的备择范围和模拟设定。
阅读边界
仅据出版社摘要,无法确认功效优势是否适用于所有离散模型和备择;摘要未说明具体正则条件、样本规模或政策应用结果。

原文摘要

This paper proposes new specification tests for conditional models with discrete responses, which are key to apply efficient maximum likelihood methods, to obtain consistent estimates of partial effects and to get appropriate predictions of the probability of future events. In particular, we test the static and dynamic ordered choice model specifications and can cover infinite support distributions for e.g. count data. The traditional approach for specification testing of discrete response models is based on probability integral transforms of a jittered discrete data which leads to continuous uniform i.i.d. series under the true conditional distribution. Then, standard specification testing techniques for continuous variables could be applied to the transformed series, but the extra randomness from jitters affects the power properties of these methods. We investigate in this paper an alternative transformation based only on original discrete data that avoids any randomization. We analyze the asymptotic properties of goodness-of-fit tests based on this new transformation and explore the properties in finite samples of a bootstrap algorithm to approximate the critical values of test statistics which are model and parameter dependent. We show analytically and in simulations that our approach dominates the methods based on randomization in terms of power. We apply the new tests to models of the monetary policy conducted by the Federal Reserve.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文