跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕样本选择模型、Heckman 两阶段估计及排除限制展开,直接关联选择模型的结构估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mikhail Zhelonkin
Marc G. Genton
Elvezio Ronchetti

样本选择模型中的稳健推断

研究问题
非随机样本选择模型中,Heckman 两阶段估计及其方差估计对小幅分布偏离有多敏感,如何构造稳健估计和选择偏差检验?
方法与思路
作者利用影响函数与方差变化函数分析两阶段估计的稳健性,提出稳健化程序,并分别处理有无排除限制的情形。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文揭示经典估计及方差估计的非稳健性,给出稳健估计的渐近正态性和方差,并构造选择偏差检验的稳健替代。
阅读关注点
应核对稳健化程序、允许的模型偏离及渐近条件,尤其比较有无排除限制时的识别要求,以及稳健性与效率的取舍。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,稳健化公式、识别条件及模拟数值未说明;覆盖无排除限制情形不意味着任意模型都能识别。

原文摘要

Summary The problem of non-random sample selectivity often occurs in practice in many fields. The classical estimators introduced by Heckman are the backbone of the standard statistical analysis of these models. However, these estimators are very sensitive to small deviations from the distributional assumptions which are often not satisfied in practice. We develop a general framework to study the robustness properties of estimators and tests in sample selection models. We derive the influence function and the change-of-variance function of Heckman's two-stage estimator, and we demonstrate the non-robustness of this estimator and its estimated variance to small deviations from the model assumed. We propose a procedure for robustifying the estimator, prove its asymptotic normality and give its asymptotic variance. Both cases with and without an exclusion restriction are covered. This allows us to construct a simple robust alternative to the sample selection bias test. We illustrate the use of our new methodology in an analysis of ambulatory expenditures and we compare the performance of the classical and robust methods in a Monte Carlo simulation study.

笔记与分组