跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究复杂抽样的通用标准误估计,聚类设计本身不足以归入面板或其他所列领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Leslie Kish
Martin R. Frankel

用于标准误估计的平衡重复复制法

研究问题
复杂抽样中的聚类破坏观测独立性时,如何估计回归等统计量的标准误,并用较少复制获得可靠的方差估计?
方法与思路
作者在每层含两个初级抽样单位的设计中构造半样本,以平衡重复复制估计方差,并在多项实证研究中比较标准误。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,平衡设计可减少复制次数,示例中47层使用48次复制;非线性统计量获得论证与经验支持,但完整证明仅限线性统计量。
阅读关注点
应核对半样本构造、平衡条件及方差公式,区分线性统计量证明与非线性经验依据,并检查聚类造成的标准误增幅。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;方差及比率公式存在符号缺失,需查原PDF,不重构公式;非线性证明不完整,刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

Balanced repeated replications (BRR) is a general method for computing standard errors. It is useful when mathematical distribution theory is impractical or lacking, and especially for analytical statistics based on complex samples where clustering destroys the independence of observations. Presented are results of methods used to measure standard errors of regression coefficients for several multivariate techniques. The basic designs of the several samples comprised two primary selections (PS) per stratum. Each replication was a half-sample, created by selecting one PS from each stratum. The variance of the coefficient , estimated from the entire sample, is measured by , where bj is the same estimator based on a half-sample. To increase the precision of the variance estimate, select k repeated replications and obtain the mean of the k computed variances, . Balanced repeated replications reduce the number of repetitions needed; e.g., 48 balanced replications sufficed for 47 strata in our samples. Though proofs are complete only for linear statistics, rationale and results are offered to indicate that BRR provides needed estimates of errors for nonlinear statistics. The ratios, , of actual standard errors to those of simple random sampling, (srs), are investigated for several statistics in five empirical studies. In each study the average values of exceed 1.00 and range from 1.05 for less clustered to 1.46 for more clustered samples.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文