跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究随机波动率进入收益均值方程的模型,并应用于国际股指收益,直接属于金融波动率。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Siem Jan Koopman

均值含随机波动率模型:国际股票市场的经验证据

研究问题
如何估计将不可观察波动率纳入均值方程的模型,并考察英国、美国和日本股指收益与波动率之间的跨期关系?
方法与思路
作者基于蒙特卡洛模拟构建 SVM 模型的精确极大似然估计,研究有限样本性质,并在国际股指数据中比较相关波动模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所述估计方法使 SVM 成为可行选择;应用发现当期收益与波动率存在较弱负向关系,并据此间接讨论预期成分关系。
阅读关注点
阅读全文应核对模拟似然如何计算、均值中波动率效应的识别,以及当期负向关系如何支持预期成分正向关系的解释。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断模拟误差、模型比较或关系的显著性;间接证据不足以确立因果关系,也不能推断版本变化。

原文摘要

Abstract In this paper we present an exact maximum likelihood treatment for the estimation of a Stochastic Volatility in Mean (SVM) model based on Monte Carlo simulation methods. The SVM model incorporates the unobserved volatility as an explanatory variable in the mean equation. The same extension is developed elsewhere for Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (ARCH) models, known as the ARCH in Mean (ARCH‐M) model. The estimation of ARCH models is relatively easy compared with that of the Stochastic Volatility (SV) model. However, efficient Monte Carlo simulation methods for SV models have been developed to overcome some of these problems. The details of modifications required for estimating the volatility‐in‐mean effect are presented in this paper together with a Monte Carlo study to investigate the finite sample properties of the SVM estimators. Taking these developments of estimation methods into account, we regard SV and SVM models as practical alternatives to their ARCH counterparts and therefore it is of interest to study and compare the two classes of volatility models. We present an empirical study of the intertemporal relationship between stock index returns and their volatility for the United Kingdom, the United States and Japan. This phenomenon has been discussed in the financial economic literature but has proved hard to find empirically. We provide evidence of a negative but weak relationship between returns and contemporaneous volatility which is indirect evidence of a positive relation between the expected components of the return and the volatility process. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文