跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于通用非参数检验理论,高频指分布特征而非金融高频数据,未明确对应所列专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan

基于小波阈值与 Neyman 截断的显著性检验

研究问题
传统经验分布与线性秩检验为何难以发现尖锐局部特征和高频差异,怎样构造更敏感的非参数检验?
方法与思路
作者提出基于小波阈值和 Neyman 截断的平滑型检验统计量,并讨论单样本及两样本情形中对不同备择特征的检测能力。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所给证据显示新检验更容易发现尖峰与高频交替,同时保持对平滑备择密度的检测能力,但未列出具体比较数值。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对阈值、截断阶数和显著性校准方式,并检查功效证据覆盖的备择类别、样本量及与传统检验的公平比较。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未交代功效证据的具体形式和数值,不能将其表述为普遍占优结论。

原文摘要

Traditional nonparametric tests, such as the Kolmogorov—Smirnov test and the Cramér—Von Mises test, are based on the empirical distribution functions. Although these tests possess root-n consistency, they effectively use only information contained in the low frequencies. This leads to low power in detecting fine features such as sharp and short aberrants as well as global features such as high-frequency alternations. The drawback can be repaired via smoothing-based test statistics. In this article we propose two such kind of test statistics based on the wavelet thresholding and the Neyman truncation. We provide extensive evidence to demonstrate that the proposed tests have higher power in detecting sharp peaks and high frequency alternations, while maintaining the same capability in detecting smooth alternative densities as the traditional tests. Similar conclusions can be made for two-sample nonparametric tests of distribution functions. In that case, the traditional linear rank tests such as the Wilcoxon test and the Fisher—Yates test have low power in detecting two nearby densities where one has local features or contains high-frequency components, because these procedures are essentially testing the uniform distribution based on the sample mean of rank statistics. In contrast, the proposed tests use more fully the sampling information and have better ability in detecting subtle features.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文