跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:题名与摘要均围绕时间序列去趋势、平稳性和自协方差展开,直接对应时间序列方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Charles R. Nelson
Heejoon Kang

不恰当去趋势造成的时间序列虚假周期性

研究问题
对随机游走等累积过程作时间趋势回归后,残差能否作为平稳序列分析,不恰当去趋势会怎样影响周期性判断?
方法与思路
所给摘要围绕确定性趋势与随机累积过程的区别,讨论趋势回归残差的自协方差、样本平均自协方差及其样本量依赖。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要指出,趋势回归总能计算,却不能保证残差平稳;其援引的既有结果显示,自协方差形状可能是去趋势的产物。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应区分作者新结果与摘要援引的既有结论,并核对去趋势阶数、累积过程设定及虚假周期的形成机制。
阅读边界
所给摘要主要回顾既有研究且存在文字讹误,未明确本文新增推导或周期性结论的形式,不能据此确认完整理论贡献。

原文摘要

Econometric analysis of time series data is frequently preceded by regression on time to remove a trent component in the date. The resulting residuals are then treated as a stationary series to which procedures requiring stationarity, such as spectral analysis, can be applied. The objective is often to investigate the dynamics of transitory movements in the systems, for example, in econometric models of the business cycle. When the data does consist of a deterministic function of time plus a stationary error then regression residuals will clearly be unbiased estimates of the stationary component. However, if the data is generated by (possibly repeated) summation of a satisfactory and inevitable process then the series cannot be expressed as a deterministic function of time plus a stationary deviation, even though a least squares trend line and the associated residuals can always be calculated for any given finite sample. In a recent paper, Chan, Hayya, and Ord (1977) hereafter CHO) were able to show that a residuals from linear regression of a realization of a random walk (the summation of a purely random series) on time have autocovariances which for given lag are a function of time and thereafter that the residuals are not stationary. Further, CHO established that the expected sample autocovariance function (the expected autocovariances for given lag averaged over the time interval of the sample) is a function of sample size as well as lag and therefore an artifact of the detrending procedure. This function is characterized by CHO in their figure 1 as being effectively linear in lag (although the exact function is a fifth degree polynomial) with the rate of decay from unity at the origin depending inversely on sample size.

笔记与分组