跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要提出通用模型选择后推断的决策论框架,没有明确的因果、时间序列或金融领域依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Arthur Cohen
H. B. Sackrowitz

模型选择后推断:变换型与自适应推断的决策论方法

研究问题
模型选择之后再进行检验、点估计或置信估计时,如何明确目标量,并把选择模型与后续推断的损失纳入统一评价?
方法与思路
作者构造同时包含模型选择与推断损失的决策论框架,给出贝叶斯及广义贝叶斯程序,并用于变换选择和位置尺度族的自适应推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架明确选择后推断的目标量和评价方式,并给出某种损失函数,使修改后的自适应程序具有相应最优性性质。
阅读关注点
核对目标量是否随所选模型改变、损失函数如何权衡选择和推断,以及广义贝叶斯性质、可容许性结论的具体适用条件。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,刊本差异未核验;最优性依赖所设损失函数,不能据此推断普遍的选择后覆盖率保证。

原文摘要

A decision-theory approach is formulated for inference following model selection. Inference here refers to either testing, point estimation, or confidence estimation. The loss function includes components for model selection as well as for inference and allows for flexibility in emphasis on one or the other, if such emphasis is desired. A general prescription for Bayes and generalized Bayes procedures is given. A procedure consists of model selection and inference. The general formulation is applied to transformation-based inference, where model selection is equated to choice of transformation. Hinkley and Runger (1984) did transformation-based inference that has aroused controversy. The formulation here is directed to some of these issues. In this approach we explicitly define the quantity of interest for which an inference is desired. Furthermore, we evaluate procedures properly. An example is given where one is interested in estimating the mean of the model selected and the choice of models is either lognormal or gamma. The Hinkley—Runger method and our method are compared. Hogg, Uthoff, Randles, and Davenport (1972) did adaptive inference. They selected from among a finite number of possible location-scale families and then estimated the location of the chosen family. Our formulation is appropriate for this situation. We address the issue of whether Hogg's intuitive adaptive procedure is generalized Bayes and/or admissible for a suitable loss function. We offer a loss function for which a modification of Hogg's procedure has such optimality properties.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文