跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接比较总体的随机优势程度,并以收入分布说明均值比较的局限,因此对应分位数与分布分析方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
W W Zhuang
B Y Hu
J Chen

密度比模型下优势指数的半参数推断

研究问题
均值或中位数可能无法充分反映总体相对处境;如何估计一个总体相对另一个总体的随机优势程度并进行推断?
方法与思路
作者用密度比模型联结多个总体,构造优势指数的经验似然估计,利用总体间相似性提升效率并提供自助推断方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,估计量具有渐近正态性,自助法可用于检验与区间;模拟显示效率改善,并对轻度模型误设表现稳健。
阅读关注点
应核对优势指数的定义、密度比模型限制、效率改善的比较对象,以及自助法有效性与轻度误设的实验范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;具体模型条件与数值结果未提供,模拟稳健性不等于任意误设下有效。

原文摘要

An important and often discussed research problem in statistics is how to compare several populations; examples arise in medical science, engineering, finance and other fields. Often population means or medians are compared. However, one population may have a higher mean income, for example, because of a small number of super-rich individuals; the mean therefore may not reflect the wealth of the general population. Instead, an index of the degree of stochastic dominance of one population over another would better reflect their relative wealth. Currently, we can estimate such an index under restrictive conditions, but there is no generic estimator with a known asymptotic distribution. In this paper, we suggest linking the populations via the density ratio model. Under this model, we develop an empirical likelihood estimator and establish its asymptotic normality. In addition, we improve the estimation efficiency by examining the similarities between the populations. Furthermore, we provide a valid bootstrap method for hypothesis testing and the construction of confidence intervals. Simulation experiments show that the proposed estimator substantially improves the estimation efficiency and power of the test, and leads to confidence intervals with satisfactorily precise coverage probabilities. It is also robust with respect to mild model misspecification. Two examples are given to demonstrate the usefulness of both the method and the concept.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文