Kernel Density Estimation by Spectral Decomposition: Data-Driven Tapering and Superposition
基于谱分解的核密度估计:数据驱动窗与叠加方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主题为核密度估计的带宽选择与谱方法,属于非参数统计方法研究,未涉及所给因果推断、面板、时间序列、资产定价等任何领域细分的直接文本依据,故留空。
基于谱分解的核密度估计:数据驱动窗与叠加方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Kernel density estimation depends largely on one choice, the smoothing bandwidth. We treat bandwidth selection and density estimation in the characteristic-function domain, where the cyclic group-averaged covariance of the binned data has the squared empirical characteristic function as its spectrum: the true characteristic function sits over a sampling-noise floor of $1/n$, and the bandwidth is the spectral cutoff where the two meet. Several methods follow. An automatic selector strips the floor and minimizes a frequency-domain error criterion, matching the rule of thumb on smooth densities and approaching the best fixed bandwidth on multimodal ones. An adaptive estimator generalizes the fixed kernel to the per-frequency optimal Wiener taper, matching or surpassing the best fixed bandwidth on most standard densities, including sharply peaked and comb-like cases where fixed bandwidths fail; deconvolution under known measurement error follows in the same domain. Because the Wiener estimator resolves sharp structure but does not fit smooth bases as economically as a mixture, a Gaussian mixture is combined with it two ways, a piecewise partition and a superposition of a smooth base and a band-limited residual, the default. A data-driven floor read from the spectrum replaces the assumed $1/n$ floor and stays robust on heaped and rounded data. On the Marron-Wand benchmark scored by exact integrated squared error, the advantage emerges with sample size, a bias-variance tradeoff: the spectral estimators carry low bias but pay in variance, so a corrected Botev plug-in leads at $n=100$ while the Wiener filter and superposition take the top two ranks at $n=5000$. The methods are validated on six real datasets (CRSP returns, NHANES self-reports, CMS dimuon and SDSS spectra, a random-beacon stream, and UNSW-NB15 traffic) and on a synthetic-data quality check. All experiments are reproducible.